ICICI Prudential Mutual FundClose Ended Schemes(Growth12 years
Buying brief
Evidence on this desk, framed as a purchase checklist - not SEBI-registered advice.
As of 2 May 2018
Stance
Prefer peers first
The live read flags issues. Inspect same-category alternatives before buying.
In three lines
Watch if · Long-term category-relative performance remains stronger than the most recent rolling 1-year windows, which have deteriorated across multiple periods.
Watch if · Recent return trails the category median by 3 percentage points or more, with a weak rolling win rate.
Prefer peers if · Prefer ICICI Prudential Value Fund - Series 11 if you want a same-category peer with stronger evidence.
Buy checklist
History depth
Pass
12.0 years of path to read.
Engine status
Fail
The live read flags issues. Inspect same-category alternatives before buying.
Expense ratio
n/a
TER not on file yet.
Drawdown vs peers
Pass
Peak-to-trough -19.4%. Ask whether you can hold through a similar fall.
Vs category
Fail
39% of rolling 3Y windows beat the category median, same plan and option.
Manager tenure
n/a
Manager not listed.
Exit load
n/a
No exit-load summary on file.
Tax / wrapper
Pass
Direct Growth, no ELSS lock flagged. Equity LTCG rules still apply after one year - not tax advice.
Portfolio concentration
n/a
Holdings weights not on file for this scheme yet.
Same-category peers are preloaded into compare when available.
Behaviour and wrappers - the usual India MF failure modes - not a buy instruction.
SIP discipline
Review does not mean stop the SIP tomorrow - compare peers first. Stopping on a red label often locks in the worst path.
NAV
Path not in current snapshots
n/a
Trailing CAGR and simulated monthly SIP XIRR from daily NAV. Category comparison uses the median of comparable share classes in the peer set.
Trailing CAGR
Point-to-point, calendar-day annualized
SIP XIRR
Equal monthly instalments to latest NAV
Peak to trough from a running NAV high, with the path and recovery episodes.
Drawdown
Path not in current snapshots
n/a
28 Apr 2017 – open
Trough 23 Mar 2018 · not recovered
-19.4%
19 Aug 2015 – 30 Jun 2016
Trough 25 Feb 2016 · recovered in 126 days
-17.1%
5 Aug 2016 – 14 Mar 2017
Trough 26 Dec 2016 · recovered in 78 days
-13.5%
3 Mar 2015 – 15 Jul 2015
Trough 7 May 2015 · recovered in 69 days
-8.6%
0–100 reads of named metrics. The mean is unweighted and only uses dimensions with data.
Returns
14
Vs category
0
Consistency
35
Risk-adjusted
17
Drawdown
51
Mean
24
Quantitative engine reasons behind the buying stance. An explanation can only restate what is already here.
Buying stance
Prefer peers first
The live read flags issues. Inspect same-category alternatives before buying.
Why this status
Supporting reads
No supporting reads in the current evidence set.
PERFORMANCE
Recent rolling excess versus the category median has deteriorated.
2 May 2018
Same-category peers with enough history to inspect beside this fund - including tradeoffs.
ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund
Nippon India Mutual Fund
ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund
Caveat: Deeper drawdown
ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund
Caveat: Deeper drawdown
ICICI Prudential Mutual Fund
Caveat: Deeper drawdown
ICICI Prudential Mutual FundClose Ended Schemes(Growth12 years
Buying brief
Evidence on this desk, framed as a purchase checklist - not SEBI-registered advice.
As of 2 May 2018
Stance
Prefer peers first
The live read flags issues. Inspect same-category alternatives before buying.
In three lines
Watch if · Long-term category-relative performance remains stronger than the most recent rolling 1-year windows, which have deteriorated across multiple periods.
Watch if · Recent return trails the category median by 3 percentage points or more, with a weak rolling win rate.
Prefer peers if · Prefer ICICI Prudential Value Fund - Series 11 if you want a same-category peer with stronger evidence.
Buy checklist
History depth
Pass
12.0 years of path to read.
Engine status
Fail
The live read flags issues. Inspect same-category alternatives before buying.
Expense ratio
n/a
TER not on file yet.
Drawdown vs peers
Pass
Peak-to-trough -19.4%. Ask whether you can hold through a similar fall.
Vs category
Fail
39% of rolling 3Y windows beat the category median, same plan and option.
Manager tenure
n/a
Manager not listed.
Exit load
n/a
No exit-load summary on file.
Tax / wrapper
Pass
Direct Growth, no ELSS lock flagged. Equity LTCG rules still apply after one year - not tax advice.
Portfolio concentration
n/a
Holdings weights not on file for this scheme yet.
Same-category peers are preloaded into compare when available.
Behaviour and wrappers - the usual India MF failure modes - not a buy instruction.
SIP discipline
Review does not mean stop the SIP tomorrow - compare peers first. Stopping on a red label often locks in the worst path.
NAV
2 May 2018 · -11.9% over 1Y
10.89
Trailing CAGR and simulated monthly SIP XIRR from daily NAV. Category comparison uses the median of comparable share classes in the peer set.
Trailing CAGR
Point-to-point, calendar-day annualized
SIP XIRR
Equal monthly instalments to latest NAV
Peak to trough from a running NAV high, with the path and recovery episodes.
Drawdown
2 May 2018
-17.0%
28 Apr 2017 – open
Trough 23 Mar 2018 · not recovered
-19.4%
19 Aug 2015 – 30 Jun 2016
Trough 25 Feb 2016 · recovered in 126 days
-17.1%
5 Aug 2016 – 14 Mar 2017
Trough 26 Dec 2016 · recovered in 78 days
-13.5%
3 Mar 2015 – 15 Jul 2015
Trough 7 May 2015 · recovered in 69 days
-8.6%
0–100 reads of named metrics. The mean is unweighted and only uses dimensions with data.
Returns
14
Vs category
0
Consistency
35
Risk-adjusted
17
Drawdown
51
Mean
24
Quantitative engine reasons behind the buying stance. An explanation can only restate what is already here.
Buying stance
Prefer peers first
The live read flags issues. Inspect same-category alternatives before buying.
Why this status
Supporting reads
No supporting reads in the current evidence set.
PERFORMANCE
Recent rolling excess versus the category median has deteriorated.
2 May 2018