…

ReviewPlan n/a · IDCWPrefer peers first

Reliance Focused Large Cap Fund- Plan

Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited Growth20.7 years

NAV: 18.3188; 27 Apr 2018
1Y: -2.1%; Trailing CAGR
AUM: ₹88.54 Cr; 30 Jun 2018
Volatility: High; 20.5% annualized

NAV path pending

Buying brief

Should you add this fund?

Evidence on this desk, framed as a purchase checklist - not SEBI-registered advice.

As of 27 Apr 2018

Stance

Prefer peers first

The live read flags issues. Inspect same-category alternatives before buying.

In three lines

Watch if · Long-term category-relative performance remains stronger than the most recent rolling 1-year windows, which have deteriorated across multiple periods.
Watch if · Maximum drawdown exceeded 35%.
Prefer peers if · Prefer Sahara R.E.A.L Fund - Dividend Option if you want a same-category peer with stronger evidence.

Buy checklist

History depth
Pass
20.7 years of path to read.
Engine status
Fail
The live read flags issues. Inspect same-category alternatives before buying.
Expense ratio
n/a
TER not on file yet.
Drawdown vs peers
Watch
Peak-to-trough -55.4%. Ask whether you can hold through a similar fall.
Vs category
Fail
22% of rolling 3Y windows beat the category median, same plan and option.
Manager tenure
n/a
Manager not listed.
Exit load
n/a
No exit-load summary on file.
Tax / payout
Watch
IDCW pays out and usually slows compounding. Growth is the default for multi-year wealth jobs.
Portfolio concentration
n/a
Holdings weights not on file for this scheme yet.

Browse category

Same-category peers are preloaded into compare when available.

Before you buy or SIP

Behaviour and wrappers - the usual India MF failure modes - not a buy instruction.

SIP discipline
Review does not mean stop the SIP tomorrow - compare peers first. Stopping on a red label often locks in the worst path.
IDCW vs Growth
IDCW pays out and usually slows compounding. For multi-year wealth jobs, Growth is the default FA stance.

NAV

Path not in current snapshots

n/a

Returns

Trailing CAGR and simulated monthly SIP XIRR from daily NAV. Category comparison uses the median of comparable share classes in the peer set.

Trailing CAGR

Point-to-point, calendar-day annualized

1Y-2.1%
3Y-1.5%
5Y+4.8%
10Y+2.7%
SI+4.9%

SIP XIRR

Equal monthly instalments to latest NAV

1Y-10.7%
3Y-1.3%
5Y+0.8%
10Y+4.0%

Since inception: +4.9%; Calendar-day CAGR
Excess 1Y: +24.4%; Category median, same plan and option
3Y win rate: +22%; Windows beating the median
3Y percentile: 100; Vs comparable share classes
SIP 3Y XIRR: -1.3%; Simulated monthly SIP
Worst rolling 3Y: -7.6%; 2231 daily-ending windows
Median rolling 3Y: +4.7%; Calendar-day CAGR
Positive rolling 5Y: +88%; 1738 daily-ending windows

Drawdown

Peak to trough from a running NAV high, with the path and recovery episodes.

Max drawdown: -55.4%; Worst peak-to-trough
Current: -20.7%; Below last peak
Current spell: 1184 days; Days below latest peak
Time below peak: +95%; NAV observations

Drawdown

Path not in current snapshots

n/a

Average recovery: 41 days; 57 recovered episodes
Longest recovery: 1901 days; Trough to prior peak

4 Jan 2008 – 23 May 2014
Trough 9 Mar 2009 · recovered in 1901 days
-55.4%
29 Jan 2015 – open
Trough 29 Feb 2016 · not recovered
-36.3%
10 May 2006 – 13 Oct 2006
Trough 14 Jun 2006 · recovered in 121 days
-23.5%
7 Feb 2007 – 17 May 2007
Trough 5 Mar 2007 · recovered in 73 days
-11.8%

Dimensions

0–100 reads of named metrics. The mean is unweighted and only uses dimensions with data.

Returns
100
Vs category
100
Consistency
24
Risk-adjusted
28
Drawdown
0
Mean
50

Decision

Quantitative engine reasons behind the buying stance. An explanation can only restate what is already here.

Review

Buying stance

Prefer peers first

The live read flags issues. Inspect same-category alternatives before buying.

Why this status

Long-term category-relative performance remains stronger than the most recent rolling 1-year windows, which have deteriorated across multiple periods.
Maximum drawdown exceeded 35%.
AUM fell by 30% or more versus the prior observation.

Supporting reads

Three-year return is above the category median.

What changed

PERFORMANCE
Recent rolling excess versus the category median has deteriorated.
27 Apr 2018

Worth investigating

Same-category peers with enough history to inspect beside this fund - including tradeoffs.

All funds

ReviewPlan n/a · IDCWPrefer peers first

Reliance Focused Large Cap Fund- Plan

Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited Growth20.7 years

NAV: 18.3188; 27 Apr 2018
1Y: -2.1%; Trailing CAGR
AUM: ₹88.54 Cr; 30 Jun 2018
Volatility: High; 20.5% annualized

May 2016 – Apr 2018

All funds

ReviewPlan n/a · IDCWPrefer peers first

Reliance Focused Large Cap Fund- Plan

Nippon Life India Asset Management Limited Growth20.7 years

NAV: 18.3188; 27 Apr 2018
1Y: -2.1%; Trailing CAGR
AUM: ₹88.54 Cr; 30 Jun 2018
Volatility: High; 20.5% annualized

NAV path pending

Buying brief

Should you add this fund?

Evidence on this desk, framed as a purchase checklist - not SEBI-registered advice.

As of 27 Apr 2018

Stance

Prefer peers first

The live read flags issues. Inspect same-category alternatives before buying.

In three lines

Watch if · Long-term category-relative performance remains stronger than the most recent rolling 1-year windows, which have deteriorated across multiple periods.
Watch if · Maximum drawdown exceeded 35%.
Prefer peers if · Prefer Sahara R.E.A.L Fund - Dividend Option if you want a same-category peer with stronger evidence.

Buy checklist

History depth
Pass
20.7 years of path to read.
Engine status
Fail
The live read flags issues. Inspect same-category alternatives before buying.
Expense ratio
n/a
TER not on file yet.
Drawdown vs peers
Watch
Peak-to-trough -55.4%. Ask whether you can hold through a similar fall.
Vs category
Fail
22% of rolling 3Y windows beat the category median, same plan and option.
Manager tenure
n/a
Manager not listed.
Exit load
n/a
No exit-load summary on file.
Tax / payout
Watch
IDCW pays out and usually slows compounding. Growth is the default for multi-year wealth jobs.
Portfolio concentration
n/a
Holdings weights not on file for this scheme yet.

Browse category

Same-category peers are preloaded into compare when available.

Before you buy or SIP

Behaviour and wrappers - the usual India MF failure modes - not a buy instruction.

SIP discipline
Review does not mean stop the SIP tomorrow - compare peers first. Stopping on a red label often locks in the worst path.
IDCW vs Growth
IDCW pays out and usually slows compounding. For multi-year wealth jobs, Growth is the default FA stance.

NAV

27 Apr 2018 · -2.1% over 1Y

18.3188

Apr 201717.3078 – 21.735Apr 2018

Returns

Trailing CAGR and simulated monthly SIP XIRR from daily NAV. Category comparison uses the median of comparable share classes in the peer set.

Trailing CAGR

Point-to-point, calendar-day annualized

1Y-2.1%
3Y-1.5%
5Y+4.8%
10Y+2.7%
SI+4.9%

SIP XIRR

Equal monthly instalments to latest NAV

1Y-10.7%
3Y-1.3%
5Y+0.8%
10Y+4.0%

Since inception: +4.9%; Calendar-day CAGR
Excess 1Y: +24.4%; Category median, same plan and option
3Y win rate: +22%; Windows beating the median
3Y percentile: 100; Vs comparable share classes
SIP 3Y XIRR: -1.3%; Simulated monthly SIP
Worst rolling 3Y: -7.6%; 2231 daily-ending windows
Median rolling 3Y: +4.7%; Calendar-day CAGR
Positive rolling 5Y: +88%; 1738 daily-ending windows

Drawdown

Peak to trough from a running NAV high, with the path and recovery episodes.

Max drawdown: -55.4%; Worst peak-to-trough
Current: -20.7%; Below last peak
Current spell: 1184 days; Days below latest peak
Time below peak: +95%; NAV observations

Drawdown

27 Apr 2018

-20.7%

Apr 2006-54.5% – 0.0%Apr 2018

Average recovery: 41 days; 57 recovered episodes
Longest recovery: 1901 days; Trough to prior peak

4 Jan 2008 – 23 May 2014
Trough 9 Mar 2009 · recovered in 1901 days
-55.4%
29 Jan 2015 – open
Trough 29 Feb 2016 · not recovered
-36.3%
10 May 2006 – 13 Oct 2006
Trough 14 Jun 2006 · recovered in 121 days
-23.5%
7 Feb 2007 – 17 May 2007
Trough 5 Mar 2007 · recovered in 73 days
-11.8%

Dimensions

0–100 reads of named metrics. The mean is unweighted and only uses dimensions with data.

Returns
100
Vs category
100
Consistency
24
Risk-adjusted
28
Drawdown
0
Mean
50

Decision

Quantitative engine reasons behind the buying stance. An explanation can only restate what is already here.

Review

Buying stance

Prefer peers first

The live read flags issues. Inspect same-category alternatives before buying.

Why this status

Long-term category-relative performance remains stronger than the most recent rolling 1-year windows, which have deteriorated across multiple periods.
Maximum drawdown exceeded 35%.
AUM fell by 30% or more versus the prior observation.

Supporting reads

Three-year return is above the category median.

What changed

PERFORMANCE
Recent rolling excess versus the category median has deteriorated.
27 Apr 2018

Buying brief

Should you add this fund?

Evidence on this desk, framed as a purchase checklist - not SEBI-registered advice.

As of 27 Apr 2018

Stance

Prefer peers first

The live read flags issues. Inspect same-category alternatives before buying.

In three lines

Watch if · Long-term category-relative performance remains stronger than the most recent rolling 1-year windows, which have deteriorated across multiple periods.
Watch if · Maximum drawdown exceeded 35%.
Prefer peers if · Prefer Sahara R.E.A.L Fund - Dividend Option if you want a same-category peer with stronger evidence.

Buy checklist

History depth
Pass
20.7 years of path to read.
Engine status
Fail
The live read flags issues. Inspect same-category alternatives before buying.
Expense ratio
n/a
TER not on file yet.
Drawdown vs peers
Watch
Peak-to-trough -55.4%. Ask whether you can hold through a similar fall.
Vs category
Fail
22% of rolling 3Y windows beat the category median, same plan and option.
Manager tenure
n/a
Manager not listed.
Exit load
n/a
No exit-load summary on file.
Tax / payout
Watch
IDCW pays out and usually slows compounding. Growth is the default for multi-year wealth jobs.
Portfolio concentration
n/a
Holdings weights not on file for this scheme yet.

Browse category

Same-category peers are preloaded into compare when available.

Before you buy or SIP

Behaviour and wrappers - the usual India MF failure modes - not a buy instruction.

SIP discipline
Review does not mean stop the SIP tomorrow - compare peers first. Stopping on a red label often locks in the worst path.
IDCW vs Growth
IDCW pays out and usually slows compounding. For multi-year wealth jobs, Growth is the default FA stance.

NAV

Path not in current snapshots

n/a

Returns

Trailing CAGR and simulated monthly SIP XIRR from daily NAV. Category comparison uses the median of comparable share classes in the peer set.

Trailing CAGR

Point-to-point, calendar-day annualized

1Y-2.1%
3Y-1.5%
5Y+4.8%
10Y+2.7%
SI+4.9%

SIP XIRR

Equal monthly instalments to latest NAV

1Y-10.7%
3Y-1.3%
5Y+0.8%
10Y+4.0%

Since inception: +4.9%; Calendar-day CAGR
Excess 1Y: +24.4%; Category median, same plan and option
3Y win rate: +22%; Windows beating the median
3Y percentile: 100; Vs comparable share classes
SIP 3Y XIRR: -1.3%; Simulated monthly SIP
Worst rolling 3Y: -7.6%; 2231 daily-ending windows
Median rolling 3Y: +4.7%; Calendar-day CAGR
Positive rolling 5Y: +88%; 1738 daily-ending windows

Drawdown

Peak to trough from a running NAV high, with the path and recovery episodes.

Max drawdown: -55.4%; Worst peak-to-trough
Current: -20.7%; Below last peak
Current spell: 1184 days; Days below latest peak
Time below peak: +95%; NAV observations

Drawdown

Path not in current snapshots

n/a

Average recovery: 41 days; 57 recovered episodes
Longest recovery: 1901 days; Trough to prior peak

4 Jan 2008 – 23 May 2014
Trough 9 Mar 2009 · recovered in 1901 days
-55.4%
29 Jan 2015 – open
Trough 29 Feb 2016 · not recovered
-36.3%
10 May 2006 – 13 Oct 2006
Trough 14 Jun 2006 · recovered in 121 days
-23.5%
7 Feb 2007 – 17 May 2007
Trough 5 Mar 2007 · recovered in 73 days
-11.8%

Dimensions

0–100 reads of named metrics. The mean is unweighted and only uses dimensions with data.

Returns
100
Vs category
100
Consistency
24
Risk-adjusted
28
Drawdown
0
Mean
50

Decision

Quantitative engine reasons behind the buying stance. An explanation can only restate what is already here.

Review

Buying stance

Prefer peers first

The live read flags issues. Inspect same-category alternatives before buying.

Why this status

Long-term category-relative performance remains stronger than the most recent rolling 1-year windows, which have deteriorated across multiple periods.
Maximum drawdown exceeded 35%.
AUM fell by 30% or more versus the prior observation.

Supporting reads

Three-year return is above the category median.

What changed

PERFORMANCE
Recent rolling excess versus the category median has deteriorated.
27 Apr 2018

Worth investigating

Same-category peers with enough history to inspect beside this fund - including tradeoffs.

Buying brief

Should you add this fund?

Evidence on this desk, framed as a purchase checklist - not SEBI-registered advice.

As of 27 Apr 2018

Stance

Prefer peers first

The live read flags issues. Inspect same-category alternatives before buying.

In three lines

Watch if · Long-term category-relative performance remains stronger than the most recent rolling 1-year windows, which have deteriorated across multiple periods.
Watch if · Maximum drawdown exceeded 35%.
Prefer peers if · Prefer Sahara R.E.A.L Fund - Dividend Option if you want a same-category peer with stronger evidence.

Buy checklist

History depth
Pass
20.7 years of path to read.
Engine status
Fail
The live read flags issues. Inspect same-category alternatives before buying.
Expense ratio
n/a
TER not on file yet.
Drawdown vs peers
Watch
Peak-to-trough -55.4%. Ask whether you can hold through a similar fall.
Vs category
Fail
22% of rolling 3Y windows beat the category median, same plan and option.
Manager tenure
n/a
Manager not listed.
Exit load
n/a
No exit-load summary on file.
Tax / payout
Watch
IDCW pays out and usually slows compounding. Growth is the default for multi-year wealth jobs.
Portfolio concentration
n/a
Holdings weights not on file for this scheme yet.

Browse category

Same-category peers are preloaded into compare when available.

Before you buy or SIP

Behaviour and wrappers - the usual India MF failure modes - not a buy instruction.

SIP discipline
Review does not mean stop the SIP tomorrow - compare peers first. Stopping on a red label often locks in the worst path.
IDCW vs Growth
IDCW pays out and usually slows compounding. For multi-year wealth jobs, Growth is the default FA stance.

NAV

27 Apr 2018 · -2.1% over 1Y

18.3188

Apr 201717.3078 – 21.735Apr 2018

Returns

Trailing CAGR and simulated monthly SIP XIRR from daily NAV. Category comparison uses the median of comparable share classes in the peer set.

Trailing CAGR

Point-to-point, calendar-day annualized

1Y-2.1%
3Y-1.5%
5Y+4.8%
10Y+2.7%
SI+4.9%

SIP XIRR

Equal monthly instalments to latest NAV

1Y-10.7%
3Y-1.3%
5Y+0.8%
10Y+4.0%

Since inception: +4.9%; Calendar-day CAGR
Excess 1Y: +24.4%; Category median, same plan and option
3Y win rate: +22%; Windows beating the median
3Y percentile: 100; Vs comparable share classes
SIP 3Y XIRR: -1.3%; Simulated monthly SIP
Worst rolling 3Y: -7.6%; 2231 daily-ending windows
Median rolling 3Y: +4.7%; Calendar-day CAGR
Positive rolling 5Y: +88%; 1738 daily-ending windows

Drawdown

Peak to trough from a running NAV high, with the path and recovery episodes.

Max drawdown: -55.4%; Worst peak-to-trough
Current: -20.7%; Below last peak
Current spell: 1184 days; Days below latest peak
Time below peak: +95%; NAV observations

Drawdown

27 Apr 2018

-20.7%

Apr 2006-54.5% – 0.0%Apr 2018

Average recovery: 41 days; 57 recovered episodes
Longest recovery: 1901 days; Trough to prior peak

4 Jan 2008 – 23 May 2014
Trough 9 Mar 2009 · recovered in 1901 days
-55.4%
29 Jan 2015 – open
Trough 29 Feb 2016 · not recovered
-36.3%
10 May 2006 – 13 Oct 2006
Trough 14 Jun 2006 · recovered in 121 days
-23.5%
7 Feb 2007 – 17 May 2007
Trough 5 Mar 2007 · recovered in 73 days
-11.8%

Dimensions

0–100 reads of named metrics. The mean is unweighted and only uses dimensions with data.

Returns
100
Vs category
100
Consistency
24
Risk-adjusted
28
Drawdown
0
Mean
50

Decision

Quantitative engine reasons behind the buying stance. An explanation can only restate what is already here.

Review

Buying stance

Prefer peers first

The live read flags issues. Inspect same-category alternatives before buying.

Why this status

Long-term category-relative performance remains stronger than the most recent rolling 1-year windows, which have deteriorated across multiple periods.
Maximum drawdown exceeded 35%.
AUM fell by 30% or more versus the prior observation.

Supporting reads

Three-year return is above the category median.

What changed

PERFORMANCE
Recent rolling excess versus the category median has deteriorated.
27 Apr 2018