UTI Mutual FundHybrid Scheme - Conservative Hybrid Fund6.7 years
Buying brief
Evidence on this desk, framed as a purchase checklist - not SEBI-registered advice.
As of 27 Jan 2022
Stance
Watch before adding
Recent evidence is mixed. Compare peers before increasing exposure.
In three lines
Fits if · AUM fell by 30% or more versus the prior observation.
Watch if · Risk metrics are withheld because the NAV history contains an implausible daily move above 50%.
Prefer peers if · Prefer BANDHAN CONSERVATIVE HYBRID FUND if you want a same-category peer with stronger evidence.
Buy checklist
History depth
Pass
6.7 years of path to read.
Engine status
Watch
Recent evidence is mixed. Compare peers before increasing exposure.
Expense ratio
n/a
TER not on file yet.
Drawdown vs peers
Pass
Peak-to-trough -24.1%. Ask whether you can hold through a similar fall.
Vs category
n/a
Category relative read still thin.
Manager tenure
n/a
Manager not listed.
Exit load
n/a
No exit-load summary on file.
Plan class
Watch
Regular plan - switch the buy to Direct Growth of the same scheme when you can.
Portfolio concentration
Watch
Top 10 holdings ≈ 100.0% of the portfolio.
Same-category peers are preloaded into compare when available.
Behaviour and wrappers - the usual India MF failure modes - not a buy instruction.
Drawdown rehearsal
This scheme’s worst fall on file is about 24%. Before you SIP, ask whether you would keep contributing through a similar drop - pausing on fear is the usual India MF failure mode.
SIP discipline
Monitor is recent mixed evidence - keep the SIP unless the buying brief says prefer peers, then swap with intent.
Regular plan drag
Regular TER compounds against you on long SIPs. Prefer the Direct Growth class of the same scheme when you buy.
NAV
Path not in current snapshots
n/a
Trailing CAGR and simulated monthly SIP XIRR from daily NAV. Category comparison uses the median of comparable share classes in the peer set.
Trailing CAGR
Point-to-point, calendar-day annualized
SIP XIRR
Equal monthly instalments to latest NAV
Peak to trough from a running NAV high, with the path and recovery episodes.
Drawdown
Path not in current snapshots
n/a
25 Jan 2021 – 27 Jan 2022
Trough 27 Jan 2021 · recovered in 365 days
-24.1%
0–100 reads of named metrics. The mean is unweighted and only uses dimensions with data.
Returns
100
Vs category
n/a
Consistency
n/a
Risk-adjusted
n/a
Drawdown
40
Mean
n/a
Quantitative engine reasons behind the buying stance. An explanation can only restate what is already here.
Buying stance
Watch before adding
Recent evidence is mixed. Compare peers before increasing exposure.
Why this status
Supporting reads
No supporting reads in the current evidence set.
Risk metrics are withheld because the NAV history contains an implausible daily move above 50%.
31 Aug 2026 · 2 holdings · top 10 are 100.0%.
Asset mix
Debt
90.4%
Cash
9.6%
Sectors
Technology
90.4%
Unspecified
9.6%
Same-category peers with enough history to inspect beside this fund - including tradeoffs.
Bandhan Mutual Fund
Caveat: Lower trailing returns
Franklin Templeton Mutual Fund
Caveat: Lower trailing returns
LIC Mutual Fund
Caveat: Lower trailing returns
Nippon India Mutual Fund
Caveat: Lower trailing returns
PPFAS Mutual Fund
Caveat: Lower trailing returns
UTI Mutual FundHybrid Scheme - Conservative Hybrid Fund6.7 years
Buying brief
Evidence on this desk, framed as a purchase checklist - not SEBI-registered advice.
As of 27 Jan 2022
Stance
Watch before adding
Recent evidence is mixed. Compare peers before increasing exposure.
In three lines
Fits if · AUM fell by 30% or more versus the prior observation.
Watch if · Risk metrics are withheld because the NAV history contains an implausible daily move above 50%.
Prefer peers if · Prefer BANDHAN CONSERVATIVE HYBRID FUND if you want a same-category peer with stronger evidence.
Buy checklist
History depth
Pass
6.7 years of path to read.
Engine status
Watch
Recent evidence is mixed. Compare peers before increasing exposure.
Expense ratio
n/a
TER not on file yet.
Drawdown vs peers
Pass
Peak-to-trough -24.1%. Ask whether you can hold through a similar fall.
Vs category
n/a
Category relative read still thin.
Manager tenure
n/a
Manager not listed.
Exit load
n/a
No exit-load summary on file.
Plan class
Watch
Regular plan - switch the buy to Direct Growth of the same scheme when you can.
Portfolio concentration
Watch
Top 10 holdings ≈ 100.0% of the portfolio.
Same-category peers are preloaded into compare when available.
Behaviour and wrappers - the usual India MF failure modes - not a buy instruction.
Drawdown rehearsal
This scheme’s worst fall on file is about 24%. Before you SIP, ask whether you would keep contributing through a similar drop - pausing on fear is the usual India MF failure mode.
SIP discipline
Monitor is recent mixed evidence - keep the SIP unless the buying brief says prefer peers, then swap with intent.
Regular plan drag
Regular TER compounds against you on long SIPs. Prefer the Direct Growth class of the same scheme when you buy.
NAV
27 Jan 2022 · +339.0% over 1Y
4.08
Trailing CAGR and simulated monthly SIP XIRR from daily NAV. Category comparison uses the median of comparable share classes in the peer set.
Trailing CAGR
Point-to-point, calendar-day annualized
SIP XIRR
Equal monthly instalments to latest NAV
Peak to trough from a running NAV high, with the path and recovery episodes.
Drawdown
27 Jan 2022
0.0%
25 Jan 2021 – 27 Jan 2022
Trough 27 Jan 2021 · recovered in 365 days
-24.1%
0–100 reads of named metrics. The mean is unweighted and only uses dimensions with data.
Returns
100
Vs category
n/a
Consistency
n/a
Risk-adjusted
n/a
Drawdown
40
Mean
n/a
Quantitative engine reasons behind the buying stance. An explanation can only restate what is already here.
Buying stance
Watch before adding
Recent evidence is mixed. Compare peers before increasing exposure.
Why this status
Supporting reads
No supporting reads in the current evidence set.
Risk metrics are withheld because the NAV history contains an implausible daily move above 50%.
31 Aug 2026 · 2 holdings · top 10 are 100.0%.
Asset mix
Debt
90.4%
Cash
9.6%
Sectors
Technology
90.4%
Unspecified
9.6%