Kotak Mahindra Mutual FundHybrid Scheme - Aggressive Hybrid Fund13.8 years
Buying brief
Evidence on this desk, framed as a purchase checklist - not SEBI-registered advice.
As of 29 Oct 2026
Stance
Prefer peers first
The live read flags issues. Inspect same-category alternatives before buying.
In three lines
Watch if · Maximum drawdown exceeded 35%.
Prefer peers if · Prefer Bandhan Aggressive Hybrid Fund if you want a same-category peer with stronger evidence.
Buy checklist
History depth
Pass
13.8 years of path to read.
Engine status
Fail
The live read flags issues. Inspect same-category alternatives before buying.
Expense ratio
Pass
0.64% TER (Direct). Lower cost compounds on long SIPs.
Drawdown vs peers
Watch
Peak-to-trough -47.4%. Ask whether you can hold through a similar fall.
Vs category
Watch
49% of rolling 3Y windows beat the category median, same plan and option.
Manager tenure
n/a
Manager not listed.
Exit load
n/a
No exit-load summary on file.
Tax / wrapper
Pass
Direct Growth, no ELSS lock flagged. Equity LTCG rules still apply after one year - not tax advice.
Portfolio concentration
Pass
Top 10 holdings ≈ 33.6% of the portfolio.
Same-category peers are preloaded into compare when available.
Behaviour and wrappers - the usual India MF failure modes - not a buy instruction.
Drawdown rehearsal
This scheme’s worst fall on file is about 47%. Before you SIP, ask whether you would keep contributing through a similar drop - pausing on fear is the usual India MF failure mode.
SIP discipline
Review does not mean stop the SIP tomorrow - compare peers first. Stopping on a red label often locks in the worst path.
NAV
Path not in current snapshots
n/a
Trailing CAGR and simulated monthly SIP XIRR from daily NAV. Category comparison uses the median of comparable share classes in the peer set.
Trailing CAGR
Point-to-point, calendar-day annualized
SIP XIRR
Equal monthly instalments to latest NAV
Peak to trough from a running NAV high, with the path and recovery episodes.
Drawdown
Path not in current snapshots
n/a
18 Jan 2013 – 24 May 2021
Trough 23 Mar 2020 · recovered in 427 days
-47.4%
27 Sept 2024 – 27 Jun 2025
Trough 28 Feb 2025 · recovered in 119 days
-14.6%
17 Jan 2022 – 17 Aug 2022
Trough 20 Jun 2022 · recovered in 58 days
-11.7%
11 Feb 2026 – 7 May 2026
Trough 30 Mar 2026 · recovered in 38 days
-10.8%
0–100 reads of named metrics. The mean is unweighted and only uses dimensions with data.
Returns
75
Vs category
58
Consistency
47
Risk-adjusted
26
Drawdown
0
Mean
41
Quantitative engine reasons behind the buying stance. An explanation can only restate what is already here.
Buying stance
Prefer peers first
The live read flags issues. Inspect same-category alternatives before buying.
Why this status
Supporting reads
31 Aug 2026 · 122 holdings · top 10 are 33.6%.
Asset mix
Equity
78.3%
Debt
16.6%
Cash
5.1%
Sectors
Financial (debt)
36.7%
Financial
36.4%
Technology
18.2%
Technology (debt)
14.2%
Materials
11.8%
Same-category peers with enough history to inspect beside this fund - including tradeoffs.
Bandhan Mutual Fund
Caveat: Higher TER
Edelweiss Mutual Fund
Caveat: Higher TER
quant Mutual Fund
Caveat: Higher TER
DSP Mutual Fund
Caveat: Higher TER · Lower trailing returns
Franklin Templeton Mutual Fund
Caveat: Higher TER · Lower trailing returns
Kotak Mahindra Mutual FundHybrid Scheme - Aggressive Hybrid Fund13.8 years
Buying brief
Evidence on this desk, framed as a purchase checklist - not SEBI-registered advice.
As of 29 Oct 2026
Stance
Prefer peers first
The live read flags issues. Inspect same-category alternatives before buying.
In three lines
Watch if · Maximum drawdown exceeded 35%.
Prefer peers if · Prefer Bandhan Aggressive Hybrid Fund if you want a same-category peer with stronger evidence.
Buy checklist
History depth
Pass
13.8 years of path to read.
Engine status
Fail
The live read flags issues. Inspect same-category alternatives before buying.
Expense ratio
Pass
0.64% TER (Direct). Lower cost compounds on long SIPs.
Drawdown vs peers
Watch
Peak-to-trough -47.4%. Ask whether you can hold through a similar fall.
Vs category
Watch
49% of rolling 3Y windows beat the category median, same plan and option.
Manager tenure
n/a
Manager not listed.
Exit load
n/a
No exit-load summary on file.
Tax / wrapper
Pass
Direct Growth, no ELSS lock flagged. Equity LTCG rules still apply after one year - not tax advice.
Portfolio concentration
Pass
Top 10 holdings ≈ 33.6% of the portfolio.
Same-category peers are preloaded into compare when available.
Behaviour and wrappers - the usual India MF failure modes - not a buy instruction.
Drawdown rehearsal
This scheme’s worst fall on file is about 47%. Before you SIP, ask whether you would keep contributing through a similar drop - pausing on fear is the usual India MF failure mode.
SIP discipline
Review does not mean stop the SIP tomorrow - compare peers first. Stopping on a red label often locks in the worst path.
NAV
29 Oct 2026 · -2.8% over 1Y
45.423
Trailing CAGR and simulated monthly SIP XIRR from daily NAV. Category comparison uses the median of comparable share classes in the peer set.
Trailing CAGR
Point-to-point, calendar-day annualized
SIP XIRR
Equal monthly instalments to latest NAV
Peak to trough from a running NAV high, with the path and recovery episodes.
Drawdown
29 Oct 2026
-6.3%
18 Jan 2013 – 24 May 2021
Trough 23 Mar 2020 · recovered in 427 days
-47.4%
27 Sept 2024 – 27 Jun 2025
Trough 28 Feb 2025 · recovered in 119 days
-14.6%
17 Jan 2022 – 17 Aug 2022
Trough 20 Jun 2022 · recovered in 58 days
-11.7%
11 Feb 2026 – 7 May 2026
Trough 30 Mar 2026 · recovered in 38 days
-10.8%
0–100 reads of named metrics. The mean is unweighted and only uses dimensions with data.
Returns
75
Vs category
58
Consistency
47
Risk-adjusted
26
Drawdown
0
Mean
41
Quantitative engine reasons behind the buying stance. An explanation can only restate what is already here.
Buying stance
Prefer peers first
The live read flags issues. Inspect same-category alternatives before buying.
Why this status
Supporting reads
31 Aug 2026 · 122 holdings · top 10 are 33.6%.
Asset mix
Equity
78.3%
Debt
16.6%
Cash
5.1%
Sectors
Financial (debt)
36.7%
Financial
36.4%
Technology
18.2%
Technology (debt)
14.2%
Materials
11.8%