Nippon India Mutual FundHybrid Scheme - Equity Savings7.1 years
Buying brief
Evidence on this desk, framed as a purchase checklist - not SEBI-registered advice.
As of 21 Mar 2025
Stance
Fit for a long SIP
Evidence supports keeping this on a shortlist for a multi-year equity SIP.
In three lines
Fits if · Three-year return is above the category median.
Fits if · Peak-to-trough drawdown has stayed shallower than 15%.
Watch if · Risk metrics are withheld because the NAV history contains an implausible daily move above 50%.
Buy checklist
History depth
Pass
7.1 years of path to read.
Engine status
Pass
Evidence supports keeping this on a shortlist for a multi-year equity SIP.
Expense ratio
Pass
0.99% TER (Direct). Lower cost compounds on long SIPs.
Drawdown vs peers
Pass
Peak-to-trough 0.0%. Ask whether you can hold through a similar fall.
Vs category
Fail
0% of rolling 3Y windows beat the category median, same plan and option.
Manager tenure
n/a
Manager not listed.
Exit load
n/a
No exit-load summary on file.
Tax / wrapper
Pass
Direct Growth, no ELSS lock flagged. Equity LTCG rules still apply after one year - not tax advice.
Portfolio concentration
n/a
Holdings weights not on file for this scheme yet.
Evidence supports a shortlist - confirm with peers before you buy elsewhere.
Behaviour and wrappers - the usual India MF failure modes - not a buy instruction.
Drawdown rehearsal
This scheme’s worst fall on file is about 0%. Before you SIP, ask whether you would keep contributing through a similar drop - pausing on fear is the usual India MF failure mode.
SIP discipline
If you start a SIP here, diary a 90-day check and an annual review - don’t react to every NAV print.
NAV
Path not in current snapshots
n/a
Trailing CAGR and simulated monthly SIP XIRR from daily NAV. Category comparison uses the median of comparable share classes in the peer set.
Trailing CAGR
Point-to-point, calendar-day annualized
SIP XIRR
Equal monthly instalments to latest NAV
Peak to trough from a running NAV high, with the path and recovery episodes.
Drawdown
Path not in current snapshots
n/a
No completed or open drawdown episodes in the current snapshots.
0–100 reads of named metrics. The mean is unweighted and only uses dimensions with data.
Returns
92
Vs category
100
Consistency
0
Risk-adjusted
n/a
Drawdown
100
Mean
73
Quantitative engine reasons behind the buying stance. An explanation can only restate what is already here.
Buying stance
Fit for a long SIP
Evidence supports keeping this on a shortlist for a multi-year equity SIP.
Why this status
Supporting reads
Risk metrics are withheld because the NAV history contains an implausible daily move above 50%.
No holdings or recent changes on file for this scheme yet.
Same-category peers with enough history to inspect beside this fund - including tradeoffs.
Bandhan Mutual Fund
Caveat: Deeper drawdown · Lower trailing returns
Franklin Templeton Mutual Fund
Caveat: Deeper drawdown · Lower trailing returns
Tata Mutual Fund
Caveat: Deeper drawdown · Lower trailing returns
Aditya Birla Sun Life Mutual Fund
Caveat: Deeper drawdown · Higher TER · Lower trailing returns
Bajaj Finserv Mutual Fund
Caveat: Deeper drawdown · Higher TER · Lower trailing returns
Nippon India Mutual FundHybrid Scheme - Equity Savings7.1 years
Buying brief
Evidence on this desk, framed as a purchase checklist - not SEBI-registered advice.
As of 21 Mar 2025
Stance
Fit for a long SIP
Evidence supports keeping this on a shortlist for a multi-year equity SIP.
In three lines
Fits if · Three-year return is above the category median.
Fits if · Peak-to-trough drawdown has stayed shallower than 15%.
Watch if · Risk metrics are withheld because the NAV history contains an implausible daily move above 50%.
Buy checklist
History depth
Pass
7.1 years of path to read.
Engine status
Pass
Evidence supports keeping this on a shortlist for a multi-year equity SIP.
Expense ratio
Pass
0.99% TER (Direct). Lower cost compounds on long SIPs.
Drawdown vs peers
Pass
Peak-to-trough 0.0%. Ask whether you can hold through a similar fall.
Vs category
Fail
0% of rolling 3Y windows beat the category median, same plan and option.
Manager tenure
n/a
Manager not listed.
Exit load
n/a
No exit-load summary on file.
Tax / wrapper
Pass
Direct Growth, no ELSS lock flagged. Equity LTCG rules still apply after one year - not tax advice.
Portfolio concentration
n/a
Holdings weights not on file for this scheme yet.
Evidence supports a shortlist - confirm with peers before you buy elsewhere.
Behaviour and wrappers - the usual India MF failure modes - not a buy instruction.
Drawdown rehearsal
This scheme’s worst fall on file is about 0%. Before you SIP, ask whether you would keep contributing through a similar drop - pausing on fear is the usual India MF failure mode.
SIP discipline
If you start a SIP here, diary a 90-day check and an annual review - don’t react to every NAV print.
NAV
21 Mar 2025 · +126.0% over 1Y
0.6828
Trailing CAGR and simulated monthly SIP XIRR from daily NAV. Category comparison uses the median of comparable share classes in the peer set.
Trailing CAGR
Point-to-point, calendar-day annualized
SIP XIRR
Equal monthly instalments to latest NAV
Peak to trough from a running NAV high, with the path and recovery episodes.
Drawdown
21 Mar 2025
0.0%
No completed or open drawdown episodes in the current snapshots.
0–100 reads of named metrics. The mean is unweighted and only uses dimensions with data.
Returns
92
Vs category
100
Consistency
0
Risk-adjusted
n/a
Drawdown
100
Mean
73
Quantitative engine reasons behind the buying stance. An explanation can only restate what is already here.
Buying stance
Fit for a long SIP
Evidence supports keeping this on a shortlist for a multi-year equity SIP.
Why this status
Supporting reads
Risk metrics are withheld because the NAV history contains an implausible daily move above 50%.
No holdings or recent changes on file for this scheme yet.