JM Financial Asset Management LimitedDebt Scheme - Gilt Fund34.1 years
Buying brief
Evidence on this desk, framed as a purchase checklist - not SEBI-registered advice.
As of 7 Sept 2019
Stance
Watch before adding
Recent evidence is mixed. Compare peers before increasing exposure.
In three lines
Fits if · Peak-to-trough drawdown has stayed shallower than 15%.
Prefer peers if · Prefer Bandhan Gilt Fund if you want a same-category peer with stronger evidence.
Buy checklist
History depth
Pass
34.1 years of path to read.
Engine status
Watch
Recent evidence is mixed. Compare peers before increasing exposure.
Expense ratio
n/a
TER not on file yet.
Drawdown vs peers
Pass
Peak-to-trough -9.2%. Ask whether you can hold through a similar fall.
Vs category
Fail
0% of rolling 3Y windows beat the category median, same plan and option.
Manager tenure
n/a
Manager not listed.
Exit load
n/a
No exit-load summary on file.
Tax / payout
Watch
IDCW pays out and usually slows compounding. Growth is the default for multi-year wealth jobs.
Portfolio concentration
n/a
Holdings weights not on file for this scheme yet.
Same-category peers are preloaded into compare when available.
Behaviour and wrappers - the usual India MF failure modes - not a buy instruction.
SIP discipline
Monitor is recent mixed evidence - keep the SIP unless the buying brief says prefer peers, then swap with intent.
IDCW vs Growth
IDCW pays out and usually slows compounding. For multi-year wealth jobs, Growth is the default FA stance.
NAV
Path not in current snapshots
n/a
Trailing CAGR and simulated monthly SIP XIRR from daily NAV. Category comparison uses the median of comparable share classes in the peer set.
Trailing CAGR
Point-to-point, calendar-day annualized
SIP XIRR
Equal monthly instalments to latest NAV
Peak to trough from a running NAV high, with the path and recovery episodes.
Drawdown
Path not in current snapshots
n/a
28 May 2013 – 30 Oct 2014
Trough 28 Aug 2013 · recovered in 428 days
-9.2%
2 Jan 2009 – 5 May 2010
Trough 24 Mar 2009 · recovered in 407 days
-8.8%
24 Jul 2017 – 5 Dec 2018
Trough 22 Feb 2018 · recovered in 286 days
-5.6%
24 Nov 2016 – 7 Jun 2017
Trough 10 Mar 2017 · recovered in 89 days
-4.2%
0–100 reads of named metrics. The mean is unweighted and only uses dimensions with data.
Returns
0
Vs category
50
Consistency
13
Risk-adjusted
49
Drawdown
77
Mean
38
Quantitative engine reasons behind the buying stance. An explanation can only restate what is already here.
Buying stance
Watch before adding
Recent evidence is mixed. Compare peers before increasing exposure.
Why this status
Supporting reads
No holdings or recent changes on file for this scheme yet.
Same-category peers with enough history to inspect beside this fund - including tradeoffs.
Bandhan Mutual Fund
DSP Mutual Fund
Bajaj Finserv Mutual Fund
Caveat: Lower trailing returns
JM Financial Asset Management Limited
Caveat: Higher volatility
JM Financial Asset Management Limited
Caveat: Higher volatility
JM Financial Asset Management LimitedDebt Scheme - Gilt Fund34.1 years
Buying brief
Evidence on this desk, framed as a purchase checklist - not SEBI-registered advice.
As of 7 Sept 2019
Stance
Watch before adding
Recent evidence is mixed. Compare peers before increasing exposure.
In three lines
Fits if · Peak-to-trough drawdown has stayed shallower than 15%.
Prefer peers if · Prefer Bandhan Gilt Fund if you want a same-category peer with stronger evidence.
Buy checklist
History depth
Pass
34.1 years of path to read.
Engine status
Watch
Recent evidence is mixed. Compare peers before increasing exposure.
Expense ratio
n/a
TER not on file yet.
Drawdown vs peers
Pass
Peak-to-trough -9.2%. Ask whether you can hold through a similar fall.
Vs category
Fail
0% of rolling 3Y windows beat the category median, same plan and option.
Manager tenure
n/a
Manager not listed.
Exit load
n/a
No exit-load summary on file.
Tax / payout
Watch
IDCW pays out and usually slows compounding. Growth is the default for multi-year wealth jobs.
Portfolio concentration
n/a
Holdings weights not on file for this scheme yet.
Same-category peers are preloaded into compare when available.
Behaviour and wrappers - the usual India MF failure modes - not a buy instruction.
SIP discipline
Monitor is recent mixed evidence - keep the SIP unless the buying brief says prefer peers, then swap with intent.
IDCW vs Growth
IDCW pays out and usually slows compounding. For multi-year wealth jobs, Growth is the default FA stance.
NAV
7 Sept 2019 · +12.2% over 1Y
27.7698
Trailing CAGR and simulated monthly SIP XIRR from daily NAV. Category comparison uses the median of comparable share classes in the peer set.
Trailing CAGR
Point-to-point, calendar-day annualized
SIP XIRR
Equal monthly instalments to latest NAV
Peak to trough from a running NAV high, with the path and recovery episodes.
Drawdown
7 Sept 2019
-0.3%
28 May 2013 – 30 Oct 2014
Trough 28 Aug 2013 · recovered in 428 days
-9.2%
2 Jan 2009 – 5 May 2010
Trough 24 Mar 2009 · recovered in 407 days
-8.8%
24 Jul 2017 – 5 Dec 2018
Trough 22 Feb 2018 · recovered in 286 days
-5.6%
24 Nov 2016 – 7 Jun 2017
Trough 10 Mar 2017 · recovered in 89 days
-4.2%
0–100 reads of named metrics. The mean is unweighted and only uses dimensions with data.
Returns
0
Vs category
50
Consistency
13
Risk-adjusted
49
Drawdown
77
Mean
38
Quantitative engine reasons behind the buying stance. An explanation can only restate what is already here.
Buying stance
Watch before adding
Recent evidence is mixed. Compare peers before increasing exposure.
Why this status
Supporting reads
No holdings or recent changes on file for this scheme yet.